Frequently asked questions¶
Can I backup VM disk images?¶
Yes, the deduplication technique used by Borg makes sure only the modified parts of the file are stored. Also, we have optional simple sparse file support for extract.
If you use non-snapshotting backup tools like Borg to back up virtual machines, then the VMs should be turned off for the duration of the backup. Backing up live VMs can (and will) result in corrupted or inconsistent backup contents: a VM image is just a regular file to Borg with the same issues as regular files when it comes to concurrent reading and writing from the same file.
For backing up live VMs use file system snapshots on the VM host, which establishes crash-consistency for the VM images. This means that with most file systems (that are journaling) the FS will always be fine in the backup (but may need a journal replay to become accessible).
Usually this does not mean that file contents on the VM are consistent, since file contents are normally not journaled. Notable exceptions are ext4 in data=journal mode, ZFS and btrfs (unless nodatacow is used).
Applications designed with crash-consistency in mind (most relational databases like PostgreSQL, SQLite etc. but also for example Borg repositories) should always be able to recover to a consistent state from a backup created with crash-consistent snapshots (even on ext4 with data=writeback or XFS).
Hypervisor snapshots capturing most of the VM’s state can also be used for backups and can be a better alternative to pure file system based snapshots of the VM’s disk, since no state is lost. Depending on the application this can be the easiest and most reliable way to create application-consistent backups.
Other applications may require a lot of work to reach application-consistency: It’s a broad and complex issue that cannot be explained in entirety here.
Borg doesn’t intend to address these issues due to their huge complexity and platform/software dependency. Combining Borg with the mechanisms provided by the platform (snapshots, hypervisor features) will be the best approach to start tackling them.
Can I backup from multiple servers into a single repository?¶
Yes, but in order for the deduplication used by Borg to work, it
needs to keep a local cache containing checksums of all file
chunks already stored in the repository. This cache is stored in
~/.cache/borg/. If Borg detects that a repository has been
modified since the local cache was updated it will need to rebuild
the cache. This rebuild can be quite time consuming.
So, yes it’s possible. But it will be most efficient if a single repository is only modified from one place. Also keep in mind that Borg will keep an exclusive lock on the repository while creating or deleting archives, which may make simultaneous backups fail.
Can I copy or synchronize my repo to another location?¶
Yes, you could just copy all the files. Make sure you do that while no backup is running. So what you get here is this:
- client machine —borg create—> repo1
- repo1 —copy—> repo2
There is no special borg command to do the copying, just use cp or rsync if you want to do that.
But think about whether that is really what you want. If something goes wrong in repo1, you will have the same issue in repo2 after the copy.
If you want to have 2 independent backups, it is better to do it like this:
- client machine —borg create—> repo1
- client machine —borg create—> repo2
Which file types, attributes, etc. are not preserved?¶
- UNIX domain sockets (because it does not make sense - they are meaningless without the running process that created them and the process needs to recreate them in any case). So, don’t panic if your backup misses a UDS!
- The precise on-disk (or rather: not-on-disk) representation of the holes in a sparse file. Archive creation has no special support for sparse files, holes are backed up as (deduplicated and compressed) runs of zero bytes. Archive extraction has optional support to extract all-zero chunks as holes in a sparse file.
- filesystem specific attributes, like ext4 immutable bit, see #618.
- For hardlinked symlinks, the hardlinking can not be archived (and thus, the hardlinking will not be done at extraction time). The symlinks will be archived and extracted as non-hardlinked symlinks, see #2379.
Are there other known limitations?¶
- A single archive can only reference a limited volume of file/dir metadata, usually corresponding to tens or hundreds of millions of files/dirs. When trying to go beyond that limit, you will get a fatal IntegrityError exception telling that the (archive) object is too big. An easy workaround is to create multiple archives with less items each. See also the Note about archive limitations and #1452.
Why is my backup bigger than with attic? Why doesn’t Borg do compression by default?¶
Attic was rather unflexible when it comes to compression, it always compressed using zlib level 6 (no way to switch compression off or adjust the level or algorithm).
Borg offers a lot of different compression algorithms and levels. Which of them is the best for you pretty much depends on your use case, your data, your hardware – so you need to do an informed decision about whether you want to use compression, which algorithm and which level you want to use. This is why compression defaults to none.
How can I specify the encryption passphrase programmatically?¶
The encryption passphrase or a command to retrieve the passphrase can be specified programmatically using the BORG_PASSPHRASE or BORG_PASSCOMMAND environment variables. This is convenient when setting up automated encrypted backups. Another option is to use key file based encryption with a blank passphrase. See Repository encryption for more details.
Be careful how you set the environment; using the
system() call or using inline shell scripts
BORG_PASSPHRASE=hunter12 borg ...)
might expose the credentials in the process list directly
and they will be readable to all users on a system. Using
export in a shell script file should be safe, however, as
the environment of a process is accessible only to that
When backing up to remote encrypted repos, is encryption done locally?¶
Yes, file and directory metadata and data is locally encrypted, before leaving the local machine. We do not mean the transport layer encryption by that, but the data/metadata itself. Transport layer encryption (e.g. when ssh is used as a transport) applies additionally.
When backing up to remote servers, do I have to trust the remote server?¶
Yes and No.
No, as far as data confidentiality is concerned - if you use encryption, all your files/dirs data and metadata are stored in their encrypted form into the repository.
Yes, as an attacker with access to the remote server could delete (or otherwise make unavailable) all your backups.
How can I protect against a hacked backup client?¶
Assume you backup your backup client machine C to the backup server S and C gets hacked. In a simple push setup, the attacker could then use borg on C to delete all backups residing on S.
These are your options to protect against that:
How can I protect against a hacked backup server?¶
Just in case you got the impression that pull-mode backups are way more safe than push-mode, you also need to consider the case that your backup server S gets hacked. In case S has access to a lot of clients C, that might bring you into even bigger trouble than a hacked backup client in the previous FAQ entry.
These are your options to protect against that:
- Use the standard push-mode setup (see also previous FAQ entry).
- Mount (the repo part of) S’s filesystem on C.
- Do not give S file-system level access to C.
- Have your backup server at a well protected place (maybe not reachable from the internet), configure it safely, apply security updates, monitor it, …
How can I protect against theft, sabotage, lightning, fire, …?¶
In general: if your only backup medium is nearby the backupped machine and always connected, you can easily get into trouble: they likely share the same fate if something goes really wrong.
- have multiple backup media
- have media disconnected from network, power, computer
- have media at another place
- have a relatively recent backup on your media
How do I report security issue with Borg?¶
Send a private email to the Security if you think you have discovered a security issue. Please disclose security issues responsibly.
Why do I get “connection closed by remote” after a while?¶
When doing a backup to a remote server (using a ssh: repo URL), it sometimes stops after a while (some minutes, hours, … - not immediately) with “connection closed by remote” error message. Why?
That’s a good question and we are trying to find a good answer in #636.
Why am I seeing idle borg serve processes on the repo server?¶
Maybe the ssh connection between client and server broke down and that was not yet noticed on the server. Try these settings:
# /etc/ssh/sshd_config on borg repo server - kill connection to client # after ClientAliveCountMax * ClientAliveInterval seconds with no response ClientAliveInterval 20 ClientAliveCountMax 3
If you have multiple borg create … ; borg create … commands in a already serialized way in a single script, you need to give them –lock-wait N (with N being a bit more than the time the server needs to terminate broken down connections and release the lock).
The borg cache eats way too much disk space, what can I do?¶
There is a temporary (but maybe long lived) hack to avoid using lots of disk space for chunks.archive.d (see #235 for details):
# this assumes you are working with the same user as the backup. # you can get the REPOID from the "config" file inside the repository. cd ~/.cache/borg/<REPOID> rm -rf chunks.archive.d ; touch chunks.archive.d
This deletes all the cached archive chunk indexes and replaces the directory that kept them with a file, so borg won’t be able to store anything “in” there in future.
This has some pros and cons, though:
- much less disk space needs for ~/.cache/borg.
- chunk cache resyncs will be slower as it will have to transfer chunk usage metadata for all archives from the repository (which might be slow if your repo connection is slow) and it will also have to build the hashtables from that data. chunk cache resyncs happen e.g. if your repo was written to by another machine (if you share same backup repo between multiple machines) or if your local chunks cache was lost somehow.
The long term plan to improve this is called “borgception”, see #474.
If a backup stops mid-way, does the already-backed-up data stay there?¶
Yes, Borg supports resuming backups.
During a backup a special checkpoint archive named
is saved every checkpoint interval (the default value for this is 5
minutes) containing all the data backed-up until that point.
Checkpoints only happen between files (so they don’t help for interruptions happening while a very large file is being processed).
This checkpoint archive is a valid archive (all files in it are valid and complete), but it is only a partial backup (not all files that you wanted to backup are contained in it). Having it in the repo until a successful, full backup is completed is useful because it references all the transmitted chunks up to the checkpoint. This means that in case of an interruption, you only need to retransfer the data since the last checkpoint.
If a backup was interrupted, you do not need to do any special considerations,
borg create as you always do. You may use the same archive name
as in previous attempt or a different one (e.g. if you always include the current
datetime), it does not matter.
Borg always does full single-pass backups, so it will start again from the beginning - but it will be much faster, because some of the data was already stored into the repo (and is still referenced by the checkpoint archive), so it does not need to get transmitted and stored again.
Once your backup has finished successfully, you can delete all
How can I backup huge file(s) over a unstable connection?¶
You can use this “split trick” as a workaround for the in-between-files-only checkpoints (see above), huge files and a instable connection to the repository:
Split the huge file(s) into parts of manageable size (e.g. 100MB) and create a temporary archive of them. Borg will create checkpoints now more frequently than if you try to backup the files in their original form (e.g. 100GB).
After that, you can remove the parts again and backup the huge file(s) in their original form. This will now work a lot faster as a lot of content chunks are already in the repository.
After you have successfully backed up the huge original file(s), you can remove the temporary archive you made from the parts.
We realize that this is just a better-than-nothing workaround, see #1198 for a potential solution.
Please note that this workaround only helps you for backup, not for restore.
Can I backup my root partition (/) with Borg?¶
Backing up your entire root partition works just fine, but remember to exclude directories that make no sense to backup, such as /dev, /proc, /sys, /tmp and /run.
If it crashes with a UnicodeError, what can I do?¶
Check if your encoding is set correctly. For most POSIX-like systems, try:
export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 # or similar, important is correct charset
I can’t extract non-ascii filenames by giving them on the commandline!?¶
This might be due to different ways to represent some characters in unicode or due to other non-ascii encoding issues.
If you run into that, try this:
- avoid the non-ascii characters on the commandline by e.g. extracting the parent directory (or even everything)
- mount the repo using FUSE and use some file manager
Can Borg add redundancy to the backup data to deal with hardware malfunction?¶
No, it can’t. While that at first sounds like a good idea to defend against some defect HDD sectors or SSD flash blocks, dealing with this in a reliable way needs a lot of low-level storage layout information and control which we do not have (and also can’t get, even if we wanted).
So, if you need that, consider RAID or a filesystem that offers redundant storage or just make backups to different locations / different hardware.
See also #225.
Can Borg verify data integrity of a backup archive?¶
Yes, if you want to detect accidental data damage (like bit rot), use the
check operation. It will notice corruption using CRCs and hashes.
If you want to be able to detect malicious tampering also, use an encrypted
repo. It will then be able to check using CRCs and HMACs.
I am seeing ‘A’ (added) status for a unchanged file!?¶
The files cache is used to determine whether Borg already “knows” / has backed up a file and if so, to skip the file from chunking. It does intentionally not contain files that have a modification time (mtime) same as the newest mtime in the created archive.
So, if you see an ‘A’ status for unchanged file(s), they are likely the files with the most recent mtime in that archive.
This is expected: it is to avoid data loss with files that are backed up from a snapshot and that are immediately changed after the snapshot (but within mtime granularity time, so the mtime would not change). Without the code that removes these files from the files cache, the change that happened right after the snapshot would not be contained in the next backup as Borg would think the file is unchanged.
This does not affect deduplication, the file will be chunked, but as the chunks will often be the same and already stored in the repo (except in the above mentioned rare condition), it will just re-use them as usual and not store new data chunks.
If you want to avoid unnecessary chunking, just create or touch a small or empty file in your backup source file set (so that one has the latest mtime, not your 50GB VM disk image) and, if you do snapshots, do the snapshot after that.
Since only the files cache is used in the display of files status, those files are reported as being added when, really, chunks are already used.
It always chunks all my files, even unchanged ones!¶
Borg maintains a files cache where it remembers the mtime, size and inode of files. When Borg does a new backup and starts processing a file, it first looks whether the file has changed (compared to the values stored in the files cache). If the values are the same, the file is assumed unchanged and thus its contents won’t get chunked (again).
Borg can’t keep an infinite history of files of course, thus entries in the files cache have a “maximum time to live” which is set via the environment variable BORG_FILES_CACHE_TTL (and defaults to 20). Every time you do a backup (on the same machine, using the same user), the cache entries’ ttl values of files that were not “seen” are incremented by 1 and if they reach BORG_FILES_CACHE_TTL, the entry is removed from the cache.
So, for example, if you do daily backups of 26 different data sets A, B, C, …, Z on one machine (using the default TTL), the files from A will be already forgotten when you repeat the same backups on the next day and it will be slow because it would chunk all the files each time. If you set BORG_FILES_CACHE_TTL to at least 26 (or maybe even a small multiple of that), it would be much faster.
Another possible reason is that files don’t always have the same path, for example if you mount a filesystem without stable mount points for each backup or if you are running the backup from a filesystem snapshot whose name is not stable. If the directory where you mount a filesystem is different every time, Borg assume they are different files.
Is there a way to limit bandwidth with Borg?¶
There is no command line option to limit bandwidth with Borg, but bandwidth limiting can be accomplished with pipeviewer:
Create a wrapper script: /usr/local/bin/pv-wrapper
#!/bin/sh ## -q, --quiet do not output any transfer information at all ## -L, --rate-limit RATE limit transfer to RATE bytes per second RATE=307200 pv -q -L $RATE | "$@"
Add BORG_RSH environment variable to use pipeviewer wrapper script with ssh.
export BORG_RSH='/usr/local/bin/pv-wrapper ssh'
Now Borg will be bandwidth limited. Nice thing about pv is that you can change rate-limit on the fly:
pv -R $(pidof pv) -L 102400
I am having troubles with some network/FUSE/special filesystem, why?¶
Borg is doing nothing special in the filesystem, it only uses very common and compatible operations (even the locking is just “mkdir”).
So, if you are encountering issues like slowness, corruption or malfunction when using a specific filesystem, please try if you can reproduce the issues with a local (non-network) and proven filesystem (like ext4 on Linux).
If you can’t reproduce the issue then, you maybe have found an issue within the filesystem code you used (not with Borg). For this case, it is recommended that you talk to the developers / support of the network fs and maybe open an issue in their issue tracker. Do not file an issue in the Borg issue tracker.
If you can reproduce the issue with the proven filesystem, please file an issue in the Borg issue tracker about that.
Why does running ‘borg check –repair’ warn about data loss?¶
Repair usually works for recovering data in a corrupted archive. However, it’s impossible to predict all modes of corruption. In some very rare instances, such as malfunctioning storage hardware, additional repo corruption may occur. If you can’t afford to lose the repo, it’s strongly recommended that you perform repair on a copy of the repo.
- In other words, the warning is there to emphasize that Borg:
- Will perform automated routines that modify your backup repository
- Might not actually fix the problem you are experiencing
- Might, in very rare cases, further corrupt your repository
In the case of malfunctioning hardware, such as a drive or USB hub corrupting data when read or written, it’s best to diagnose and fix the cause of the initial corruption before attempting to repair the repo. If the corruption is caused by a one time event such as a power outage, running borg check –repair will fix most problems.
Why isn’t there more progress / ETA information displayed?¶
Some borg runs take quite a bit, so it would be nice to see a progress display, maybe even including a ETA (expected time of “arrival” [here rather “completion”]).
For some functionality, this can be done: if the total amount of work is more or
less known, we can display progress. So check if there is a
But sometimes, the total amount is unknown (e.g. for
borg create we just do
a single pass over the filesystem, so we do not know the total file count or data
volume before reaching the end). Adding another pass just to determine that would
take additional time and could be incorrect, if the filesystem is changing.
Even if the fs does not change and we knew count and size of all files, we still
could not compute the
borg create ETA as we do not know the amount of changed
chunks, how the bandwidth of source and destination or system performance might
You see, trying to display ETA would be futile. The borg developers prefer to rather not implement progress / ETA display than doing futile attempts.
See also: https://xkcd.com/612/
Why am I getting ‘Operation not permitted’ errors when backing up on sshfs?¶
sshfs is not entirely POSIX-compliant when renaming files due to
a technicality in the SFTP protocol. Fortunately, it also provides a workaround
to make it behave correctly:
sshfs -o workaround=rename user@host:dir /mnt/dir
Requirements for the borg single-file binary, esp. (g)libc?¶
We try to build the binary on old, but still supported systems - to keep the minimum requirement for the (g)libc low. The (g)libc can’t be bundled into the binary as it needs to fit your kernel and OS, but Python and all other required libraries will be bundled into the binary.
If your system fulfills the minimum (g)libc requirement (see the README that is released with the binary), there should be no problem. If you are slightly below the required version, maybe just try. Due to the dynamic loading (or not loading) of some shared libraries, it might still work depending on what libraries are actually loaded and used.
In the borg git repository, there is scripts/glibc_check.py that can determine (based on the symbols’ versions they want to link to) whether a set of given (Linux) binaries works with a given glibc version.
Why was Borg forked from Attic?¶
Borg was created in May 2015 in response to the difficulty of getting new code or larger changes incorporated into Attic and establishing a bigger developer community / more open development.
More details can be found in ticket 217 that led to the fork.
Borg intends to be:
- as simple as possible, but no simpler
- do the right thing by default, but offer options
- welcome feature requests
- accept pull requests of good quality and coding style
- give feedback on PRs that can’t be accepted “as is”
- discuss openly, don’t work in the dark
- Borg is not compatible with Attic
- do not break compatibility accidentally, without a good reason or without warning. allow compatibility breaking for other cases.
- if major version number changes, it may have incompatible changes
What are the differences between Attic and Borg?¶
Here’s a (incomplete) list of some major changes:
- more open, faster paced development (see issue #1)
- lots of attic issues fixed (see issue #5)
- less chunk management overhead (less memory and disk usage for chunks index)
- faster remote cache resync (useful when backing up multiple machines into same repo)
- compression: no, lz4, zlib or lzma compression, adjustable compression levels
- repokey replaces problematic passphrase mode (you can’t change the passphrase nor the pbkdf2 iteration count in “passphrase” mode)
- simple sparse file support, great for virtual machine disk files
- can read special files (e.g. block devices) or from stdin, write to stdout
- mkdir-based locking is more compatible than attic’s posix locking
- uses fadvise to not spoil / blow up the fs cache
- better error messages / exception handling
- better logging, screen output, progress indication
- tested on misc. Linux systems, 32 and 64bit, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Mac OS X
Please read the Changelog (or
docs/changes.rst in the source distribution) for more
Borg is not compatible with original attic (but there is a one-way conversion).